Everyone has heard about game theory. Few people read, but I heard everything. At least because the theory has very little to do with.
In game theory, there are many options, but I have only one, as for me, the most intuitive and easy to use.
the point is that two people thrown into a vending machine coin. You can throw either true or false.
All 3 options result:
Thrown on this - got two
One threw a fake - he got three, and the opponent lost one.
Both threw a fake - no one gets nothing.
There are certain game styles:
SIMULATOR: Trust on the first move, and then copies the behavior of the opponent.
CHEATER: Always cheating.
NAÏVE: Always trust.
VINDICTIVE: Begins with trust, but after the first deception - begins to deceive.
DETECTIVE: First move: trust, deception, trust, trust. After cheating on the third go - acts like a Simulator. If you do not cheat, acts like a crook, all subsequent moves are deceiving.
Detective, as we see, most Mature strategy, but not sinless. What, then, if the detective is not the winning strategy?
There is one more successful strategy when playing with an unknown number of games and a large number of participants:
Simulator with the right error: First time hitting the cheating player gives you a second chance. After the second in a row - begins to repeat for the opponent.
In business it works on the principle of "the customer did not come on one consultation - OK to force majeure. The client came to two in a row, although recorded - he pays the following prepayment ahead." Most often, this cooperation ends.
Or the second option: the two cancel, forgive, unilaterally. br>
the Scheme works even in therapy, at least in life. Two cancellations, not kept promises - good-bye. br>
Two late - don't wait for me at the time. br>
And originally I brought this practice on the basis of intuition, then I read the reasoning and mathematical calculation.
So my environment became significantly less friends and acquaintances, but only the most close-minded. Remember: the environment and the work should bring satisfaction and not to cause nervous tension and disorders.
Anticipating objections: a Few friends and you hold on to the only friend who uses you for their own purposes? Is it time to think and find a new one? Yes, it will be harder than people, socially developed, having 300 people in an environment. But then it is necessary either to admit their weaknesses and to go to develop them, or recognize that you are satisfied with such relations. The choice is yours.
!
