Decided to start my speech with a delicious bagel called “what's in it for me as a result” the aim of which is to interest the listener, but I'll go without it, denoting only in the stroke than this may be useful. Sapienti sat.
In understanding how fire protection at the time of being “here and now”, can only help your immediate personal experience. The explanation of how it works, gives you the opportunity to understand something “about”, but makes it impossible to feel “what's the use.” Personal experience is also a good way to understand something about yourself.
So what is the most important access to this understanding. It is so simple and effective that, most likely, the majority refuses to practice either immediately or after one or two attempts. What really efficiently, paradoxically, enjoys low demand. In the best case, you want to know something “about” than actually to possess it. Knowledge allows you to show off your erudition and understanding poses the question about the changes. To change no one wants, they all want to talk about what you want to change. Well, okay. I'm a little distracted from the topic.
This distraction is one of the mechanisms of escape from the “here and now”. Now I realized that, and therefore returned.
Actually, the way:
to find yourself, you should stop and pay attention...what? Anything. All that is in your immediate perception - what I now see with their eyes, hear, feel. Important is this direct perception. At some point in time, the mind will throw up any ideas, memories about important matters, the desire to do anything. Most likely it will be some mouth-watering in order for them to pay attention to things. This experience should be viewed as a distraction from the immediate perception of the here and now. Next, after there are such distracting thoughts or intentions, there is a choice to shift my perception at the moment or choose what distractions intention, which arose. When I make a choice in favor of distracting intentions, and switch him entirely to his consciousness, he immediately ceases to be distracting. It is important to understand this moment of choice, then I remain included in the “here and now”.
there are a few very important nuances: if the result of the contemplation of (use this word as a synonym included) had the desire to do something - to stand, to scratch, to manipulate any object, and you choose this action, it is important to do it slowly in 2-3 times slower than usual. The purpose: to better understand its effect in the process and not execute it mechanically. If I decided to scratch his ear, it's important for me to be aware of the sensations and movements that occur. I have to shift attention to the sensations associated with the hand and make this moment all of his action as consciously.
Second, when there was a desire to be involved in thinking about something. It is desirable to realize it in action. For example, take a pencil and start to write the thoughts that come to mind. In this moment your thoughts can get ahead of ourselves, the hand will not keep up with what You write. It won't be a presence in the “here and now”. It is necessary that the idea was moving with the speed of the tip of a pencil. This must stop, thought, ran forward, and most importantly, to realize the movement of the hand in the process. If you succeed, that movement and thought are simultaneous. Thoughts will appear with exactly the speed with which the hand moves. It's quite a nice process.
Why I decided not to tell at the beginning that can give this experience? Because not having specific expectations from this experiment dictated by someone else's experience, you can find their own ways to escape from the “here and now”. To understand anything important about myself. And PE can do to stop that. My instructions is also a kind of preset, but I tried to keep them to a minimum. In the course of this experiment You can find their own ways to stay in the present moment.
good Luck!
!
