And yet I allow myself to paraphrase, forgive me, great! the Freud! And do it not to confuse, but rather to convey the idea of the field and on television to “mortal”.
Phrase Freud sounds like “gender – the fate of!”. And often it was confusing, because the floor in the conventional sense of the most just identified.
what can you do, for example, buying a puppy, not to make a mistake and choose him, not her (to distinguish the bitch from the dog)?
yeah… Look dear there under the tail. Ie the floor you will be able to identify, speaking a biological language, the primary sexual characteristics.
So, Freud at first glance (and this, by the way, he put the wine in some other authors, probably not without reason) too genitale.
And then –that creates confusion. Hearing “gender” most of us remember those signs which will certainly allow you to distinguish boys from girls will remind us of the idea of “infantile sexuality”.
But to a man from a woman to distinguish between “tail" sorry, look not necessarily!
Starting with puberty, younger children acquire those secondary sexual characteristics that easily allow you to distinguish male from female. Although it's not so simple and there are exceptions to the vast majority (for example, in the case of hormonal disorders).
Thus, for such a “revelations” not necessarily to be fixed on the line of the hips, enough to cover the body.
When it comes to sexuality also often there is a confusion of concepts. In fact sexuality is the physicality, the feeling of the body as a whole, not fixation on the genitals.
the Latter occurs in case of delay at this stage of development as a result of traumatic experience. In consequence of this injury at a deep unconscious level, the woman (girl inside) feels fear, and even dread the coming violence in the conjecture that man is in a state of "full alert" (the ELEKTRA), as well as the men (the boy inside) the fixation on the phallic stage (Oedipus complex) there is an unconscious terror of imagination that from under women's skirts will slip a toothy tentacles and destroy it.
All these horror and fantasy takes place deep in the unconscious and man are not recognized and only the signals of the body issue of internal conflict is redness of the skin, the trembling limbs.
Maturity involves a reversal of the phallic to genital.
something the author is very confused tell my reader, but what to do, because of the song words can not erase and terms has long been introduced, including the names of the stages of psychosexual development.
And here such piece turns out that the fixation on the genitals literally it's about the phallic stage, but that's about the body, it is about genital oddly enough.
So let us return rather to the body or to the floor as he said to Freud.
Not the genitals, and the body in General with all its characteristics – and the primary and secondary (tone of voice, facial hair, or lack of, body shape (triangular or inverted triangle), the development or no Breasts), plus hormonal status – all combine to determine the floor, meaning and destiny.
But the stories are different, because of the various vicissitudes and the influence from the outside turn the people from their biological destiny. And sometimes these causes are determined by the culture of the era, so the whole state and individual families.
Unconscious rejection of the body, and thus women's or men's biological destiny has a lot of reasons, but they all boil down to the rejection of their biological role in connection with the acceptance of social role, then when the society imposes a rigid view about the place of women in the family, as cook, “Laundry” and “carmike”, for example, or defines man as a creature divorced from the emotional sphere.
And what to do if she realizes that the housewife can not afford it, and the man tears come out - to give up. To abandon such life.
But all that concerns the psyche, what we are very similar, for androgynous, i.e. each of us has both male and female, but in a biological sense, we have different capabilities in terms of muscle mass and in terms of the ability to bear and bring forth children.
the Whole drama of human life is felt as the suffering of the soul, but it takes place around the body (corporeality)!
that's garbled broadcast environment often disrupt the natural course of human destiny.
Here I just want to mention that is not shared by the hard attacks of those of his colleagues who allow themselves to focus on the features that they characterize the abnormality as a customer or comments on a topic of their own psychologists-colleagues, in which they guess some "abnormalities". Thus, in my opinion, they devalue the human element and just imagine how it feels to a man who isn't confident man or woman, and so in conflict with the body, and he as a person is being devalued and humiliated!
When we meet a client or simply the person that we are not just a creature but a person with his history, with his fate.
Remember, when you contrive to condemn or appreciate that life is not a Comedy, rather a drama, and sometimes a personal tragedy.
What there to dissemble sometimes among specialists there is something similar to vanity fair with the aim of better presentation of themselves when the course is and the perfect marriage and number of children and their achievements and then someone in that much!...
As clients and psychologists – people with different fate – in marriage and divorce, with children and without children, single or paired.
I don't believe in ideal people, and ideal for professionals too, I believe in the man, no matter in what body he was born!
And when I hear stories about normal, then in me protests biologist (my first education) and I want to send all to Bremo and say “Study the lives of animals and many interesting and open about homosexuality and about hermaphroditism, etc., etc!”
whatever it was we all strive to be in harmony with body and soul and live happily ever after, what I wish!
P. S. There is such a thing as norm of reaction, i.e., it is a certain frame in which to fit parameters (height, weight, etc.) the majority of the population, but the paradox is that in critical moments when you need a new for the adaptation and survival of the species, nature leans to those individuals who, in this "norm" don't fit. This is one of the mechanisms of evolution. So a man in a critical situation, adapted for a normal range ("abnormal") in order to survive and it's not his fault that the environment in which took place his development made him such "crazy" (other, different) conditions.
and most importantly, probably still someone made a confusion, because Freud is credited with the saying that goes
and it somehow clearer.
!
