what are we talking About? About the typologies of the personality in a person's appearance. From a recent – somatology called its adherents a science, by the way.
what is not to Google: the knowledge and skills of somatology allow you in appearance to determine the psychological makeup of man, his entire vnutryanku with motives and values, and in the appendage – to see the true purpose. Not bad, huh?
the Catch is that in appearance, we can only something about the person to say. Something about ethnicity, health, material provision, tense or relaxed the person is… to be honest – that's about all you can tell about a person by their appearance.
do you Need to learn to somatology? No. You need to have a vision that will allow you to see and try some with minimal experience.
All other conclusions, and shortcuts – and guessing, generalization, "hallucinations" of projection, transfers and other amenities that the person in front of you will have a low relationship, and most do not.
This is a very warming thought that you can do to scan and put people on the shelves. But somehow even the honored specialists of psychotherapy with many years of international experience do not allow themselves to draw conclusions about people by their appearance. And strongly warn against the students, if taught.
Because it never works. In most cases, we communicate with its vision of the person, and not with himself. Therefore it is not necessary to further close contact with human beings, throwing sucked from the finger typologies.
And now someone says: “But it works!”.
No. Works the Barnum effect, the desire to simplify the world to fit the desired response and to ignore what does not fit into the desired picture. The Wikipedia has a great list of cognitive biases, we've all got them. And here they are – just work))
But, to communicate with real people or hung on labels – choice.
!
