the
I got a question in PM to comment on this picture. Strange question, of course, but indicative. I have often met in social networks it viral discussion and each time marveled, "whether it's a flash mob of trolls, who allegedly seriously discuss it, whether people really so ... dark?". Here I'm just going to consider the duck of the 21st century, and You write your opinion in the comments on this.
As You may recall, a newspaper hoax call false information, which is published in the media. And the expression is gone after a certain Robert Cornelissen, who, in 1815, decided to test the degree of gullibility of the public and published in a magazine piece on the voracity of ducks. In it he described how one duck ate nineteen of their relatives, previously chopped into pieces. After the publication of this story, everyone was talking about the incredible phenomenon. However, after some time, the author still told about his drawing. Since the expression "fake news" vested with any false information.
And this picture, which is essentially, in modern language, funny, amazing in its arrogance duck. Compare the original story, which, in principle, it is possible to believe: who knows what happens to these ducks, maybe a disease of some vultures are.
But this image is clearly, clearly, clearly not conventional (nor cubist nor impressionist, that is, without alternatives of interpretations) drawn male organ scrotum in a Cup of tea. This is a direct illustration of the allegorical expressions of euphemism "tea bag".
I am sure that among the readers quite a lot of intelligent and decent people who do not know this term, therefore, in order to relieve You of tiresome and vulgar self-enlightenment, will give a verbal definition:
Teabagging (“the dipping of a tea bag”) — this is a separate form of committing oral sexual intercourse, denoting the process, when the man puts both testicles his scrotum in the mouth, on the face or around the face (including the crown) sexual partner often with repetitive movements inwards and outwards, as if irrumatio, and this is associated with the dip.
I think that the picture was originally drawn as a self-joke, and then someone from the humorous users of the Internet may familiar with psychology, decided to put it as a test on perception. The real test of the perception, for example, is the image with the dolphins. Most children under the age of 5 can recognize in the picture, only dolphins in the bottle.
lots of other examples there are more standing. But they are quite conventional. For the diagnosis of neurotics do not use them, but, most of all, for the testing of more serious disorders: schizotypal, dissociative personality disorder, mental retardation, etc.
Whose face did You see first?
What do You notice first: a vase or the silhouettes of people?
the Title of the picture, being monosyllabic, is a provocation no doubt, and perhaps not even thought of as viral duck. After all, everything is clear! However, it was because:
1. Involves the involvement of the audience, to test yourself and comment.
2. Is accusing and makes you want to defend.
3. Erotic contents - always contributing to the popularization of the factor. the
and the fourth reason, the most interesting
4. The picture, being related to psychology, with which our society, for the most part, familiar on all kinds of pseudostem, zidometacin, reduced theories, profanations myths and combined with the esoteric science the mixes - that is, almost not knowing the real science of psychology - believed in the test and starting to doubt myself! What is provoking to read the comments and ask others to forward it to friends and make sure its normal.
I Remember the famous test from the documentary "I am Other" when the children were given porridge to try. Three sweet, salty and a fourth. And in the same sequence were asked what porridge tastes like. The fourth child, heard before that the previous children of sweet porridge, also said that his porridge sweet. In this case, the previous children are all unscientific tests in social networks, which supposedly give the truth and distort the sense a reliable test. When catches the eye of something that looks like a test, people perceive it still as a test, thanks to annotations, erotic subtext and proposed two variants of the self-test.
And now obviously confused mind seriously considering the image, trying to see the girl, hillside, wood and stones. But true, not surprisingly, is a 3rd option - it's not bloody test!
I Hope I answered the question.
Thank you.
Testuite his awareness.
Write in the comments my original opinion.
Ask questions in private messages.
Skurtul Alexander
I got a question in PM to comment on this picture. Strange question, of course, but indicative. I have often met in social networks it viral discussion and each time marveled, "whether it's a flash mob of trolls, who allegedly seriously discuss it, whether people really so ... dark?". Here I'm just going to consider the duck of the 21st century, and You write your opinion in the comments on this.
As You may recall, a newspaper hoax call false information, which is published in the media. And the expression is gone after a certain Robert Cornelissen, who, in 1815, decided to test the degree of gullibility of the public and published in a magazine piece on the voracity of ducks. In it he described how one duck ate nineteen of their relatives, previously chopped into pieces. After the publication of this story, everyone was talking about the incredible phenomenon. However, after some time, the author still told about his drawing. Since the expression "fake news" vested with any false information.
And this picture, which is essentially, in modern language, funny, amazing in its arrogance duck. Compare the original story, which, in principle, it is possible to believe: who knows what happens to these ducks, maybe a disease of some vultures are.
But this image is clearly, clearly, clearly not conventional (nor cubist nor impressionist, that is, without alternatives of interpretations) drawn male organ scrotum in a Cup of tea. This is a direct illustration of the allegorical expressions of euphemism "tea bag".
I am sure that among the readers quite a lot of intelligent and decent people who do not know this term, therefore, in order to relieve You of tiresome and vulgar self-enlightenment, will give a verbal definition:
Teabagging (“the dipping of a tea bag”) — this is a separate form of committing oral sexual intercourse, denoting the process, when the man puts both testicles his scrotum in the mouth, on the face or around the face (including the crown) sexual partner often with repetitive movements inwards and outwards, as if irrumatio, and this is associated with the dip.
I think that the picture was originally drawn as a self-joke, and then someone from the humorous users of the Internet may familiar with psychology, decided to put it as a test on perception. The real test of the perception, for example, is the image with the dolphins. Most children under the age of 5 can recognize in the picture, only dolphins in the bottle.
lots of other examples there are more standing. But they are quite conventional. For the diagnosis of neurotics do not use them, but, most of all, for the testing of more serious disorders: schizotypal, dissociative personality disorder, mental retardation, etc.
Whose face did You see first?
What do You notice first: a vase or the silhouettes of people?
the Title of the picture, being monosyllabic, is a provocation no doubt, and perhaps not even thought of as viral duck. After all, everything is clear! However, it was because:
1. Involves the involvement of the audience, to test yourself and comment.
2. Is accusing and makes you want to defend.
3. Erotic contents - always contributing to the popularization of the factor. the
and the fourth reason, the most interesting
4. The picture, being related to psychology, with which our society, for the most part, familiar on all kinds of pseudostem, zidometacin, reduced theories, profanations myths and combined with the esoteric science the mixes - that is, almost not knowing the real science of psychology - believed in the test and starting to doubt myself! What is provoking to read the comments and ask others to forward it to friends and make sure its normal.
I Remember the famous test from the documentary "I am Other" when the children were given porridge to try. Three sweet, salty and a fourth. And in the same sequence were asked what porridge tastes like. The fourth child, heard before that the previous children of sweet porridge, also said that his porridge sweet. In this case, the previous children are all unscientific tests in social networks, which supposedly give the truth and distort the sense a reliable test. When catches the eye of something that looks like a test, people perceive it still as a test, thanks to annotations, erotic subtext and proposed two variants of the self-test.
And now obviously confused mind seriously considering the image, trying to see the girl, hillside, wood and stones. But true, not surprisingly, is a 3rd option - it's not bloody test!
I Hope I answered the question.
Thank you.
Testuite his awareness.
Write in the comments my original opinion.
Ask questions in private messages.
